Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joshua Doležal's avatar

Late to this part, but want to say that I love how Substack allows for this kind of literary criticism. Like Carol, I feel more receptive to this book than I have been in the past because of your essay. This is perhaps moot now, but I think there was an interesting confluence between modernism and the rise of the public university that enabled writers like Joyce to produce "difficult" texts. This has been making the rounds, so I'm not the first to say it, but Cormac McCarthy would likely hit a brick wall if he were trying to catch an agent's eye today. I think even something like Silko's Ceremony or Almanac of the Dead would not appeal to the consolidated publishing market today. So, as much as I appreciate the value of wrestling with these literary classics, I'm also troubled by the fact that few of us can write like this today with any hope of being read. That's why I prefer Cather's approach to modernism (not that it's a competition :) -- I feel I can still grow as a writer and be received by readers today by emulating her aesthetic sensibility, which tends toward the accessible and the spare. As Cather said, the higher levels of art are all about simplification.

Expand full comment
A. Jay Adler's avatar

There was so much I considered as commentary while I was reading this, Mary -- until I got to the Berger, with which I was unfamiliar. Oh, my goodness, is it deep and moving (and how he reads it, with that voice), a period larger than a word on all you were saying. How can anyone who hasn't read Ulysses, or read it as you advise, not do it now?

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts