26 Comments

Lovely. And I can't help thinking about all the new Brutalist buildings being built in my community which invoke a Soviet-style mythology; and what it says about the vision of the future.

Expand full comment
author

I will never understand the appeal (??) of Brutalism.

Expand full comment

It's as if the Soviet era never ended. Skiddings Owen & Merrill still cranking these designs out for small cities in the Midwest. While I am thrilled to finally expand and renovate our public library in Appleton WI, it's such an unattractive building. Fits in with the rest of them they've built in spurts; 70s, 90s, and again the past ten years.

Expand full comment

Wow, reading that “the sun does not realize how wonderful it is until after a room is made" I looked up across my own living room at the setting sun streaming through western facing windows, making emphatic shadows on my dining table and chairs and the rug underneath, and thought, "Oh my god, how breathtakingly beautiful this is." Thank you for drawing my attention to the here and now.

Expand full comment
author

Oh how delightful! I can picture it! Lou Kahn was quite a poet.

Expand full comment
Sep 18Liked by Julie Gabrielli

Great essay with wonderful references. The Pantheon is indeed "awe" inspiring.

I would offer that the increase in house size also has to do with another myth, the American myth of independence, the self-made man... where "going it alone" is deemed more valuable than community and "more" is better than quality. Along with some myths around wealth. It is no longer acceptable for a family to share a bathroom, unless you are "poor". Everyone needs their own space. Everyone "deserves" their own space, their own room and bathroom, yes? Frugality was once deemed the moral good (Adlai Stevenson's presidential campaign in the 50's that used the hole in his shoe as a symbol for hard work and frugality). Today there is an underlying ethos that only suckers work hard and everyone is a star. Therefore, we "deserve" bigger houses and more toys and no longer need to acknowledge the social contracts of caring about others, the use of the commons, the destruction of resources, and so on. Myth is always changing and myth is always the underlying current of our lives. As Jung said (paraphrasing): we just need to discover what that myth is.

Expand full comment
author

Yes, I agree with all this. Quantity over quality. Individual over community. We know better.

Expand full comment

Julie, your description of watching the shaft of light beneath the oculus on the marble floor, of how it showed you the truth of our planet’s constant traveling brought me into that space with you. Thank you for that.

And thank you for continuing to keep the flame of mythos burning for your students, for us all.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for reading, Holly. I count that noticing as one of the highlights of my life. I’m touched that my words could evoke that moment for you.

Expand full comment
Sep 18Liked by Julie Gabrielli

Oh this is ecstatic Julie! Thank you for straddling the known and unknown Julie and extending your hand to guide us into a greater appreciation and awareness of this dance.

“I imagine myself moving through time and space in a thin zone between the known and the numinous. This is the dance of mythos and logos. It’s a dance I need, a dance I long for, whether I’m aware of it or not. When I embrace it, it saves me.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for reading, Kimberly. I love how sitting down to try and capture a memory or a feeling in words can open the door to insights like this.

Expand full comment

"As an architecture teacher, I will always keep the eternal flame of mythos lit." Brava, Julie✨🌟💖🙏🕊️

I love this piece so much!

Expand full comment
author

Awww! Thanks so much, Camilla! I reading thru it again this morning, it starts a bit slowly, but once I get to the architecture, it does get going. . . . Where’s a good editor when I need one? 😂

Expand full comment

Please invite that Inner Critic to go sit on the couch😁

it's a great piece!

Expand full comment
author

Thank you!! Needed that.

Expand full comment
Sep 17·edited Sep 17Liked by Julie Gabrielli

Wonderful post. Thanks Julie for sharing your insights and shedding your light on this fascinating topic. Karen Armstrong's brilliant book is one of my favourite explorations of myth too.

Your title instantly caught my eye, since I 'invented' a new myth approx. a year ago. After discovering that there is no myth about Mythos himself to be found in the ancient Greek archives, I thought, 'How can that be? Every man, woman, and their dog has their personal myth about them...'

This glaring gap needed to be filled. I'm so glad you picked up on that too.

You might enjoy reading the wordcast I published on this theme, beginning of October last year, and I'm certainly curious to know what you make of it.

https://veronikabondsymbiopaedia.substack.com/p/the-myth-of-mythos

Expand full comment
author

Oooo! That sounds wonderful. Thanks - will definitely check it out. Mythos is such a great support. We've been ruthlessly downsizing lately and I stubbornly approached the sorting with slow deliberation. And there's a fairy tale for that! Three that I can think of -- Psyche and Eros is one, and Vasilisa the Beautiful, not to mention good old Cinderella.

Expand full comment

The mythos and logos dichotomy echoes the themes explored in my series, ‘Secrets from my twilight zone,’ which was inspired by Rod Serling’s ‘The Twilight Zone.’ Serling often delved into the tension between rational thought and the power of myth, exploring how humans navigate the interplay between logic and imagination in the face of the unknown.

Expand full comment
author

Love that show. Thanks for the reminder. "Black Mirror" tapped a bit of that energy, with some success.

Expand full comment
Sep 17Liked by Julie Gabrielli

Julie, I enjoyed this piece. A little surprised at not finding Christopher Alexander in there!

I'm sorry we didn't get to know each other better in the RMI days.

Jeff

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for reading, Jeff. Glad you enjoyed it. My profs in undergrad and grad were pretty snobby about Alexander, which in itself is interesting to reflect on. They thought he was too loosey-goosey, is my best guess. Not rationally theoretical enough. Hmmmm. 🤔 Not that I buy that now, and I do appreciate his appeal to folks beyond our discipline. Sarah Susanka, of the “Not So Big House,” is another one who had / has huge influence.

Expand full comment
Sep 17Liked by Julie Gabrielli

Growing up in New York City in the 60s and 70s, I was appalled by the office buildings that were thrown up during that time. I used to walk a lot and passing those structures left me feeling sad. And then something happened in the 80s where there was more of a detailed approach to high-rise office buildings. They were created with marble fades and attention to design and detail. After that, it shifted to glass towers, which can be and on many occasions nice to look at. Especially when you blend architectural elements into the design such as a twisted shape.

What I recall, Levittown was not structured to be attractive, but rather inexpensive and affordable and for the masses. I actually knew someone who grew up in one of those houses. And unfortunately, the construction materials were cheap and not meant to last.

I do hope the trend of beautifully crafted buildings continues, especially with an attention to the environment. I love seeing rooftop gardens and living walls. These elements marry nature and mythos with logos.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for these thoughtful observations. It is astounding how ugly those 60s and 70s buildings were. It's what happens when you throw out the whole history of architecture, dismiss it as irrelevant, and invent your own language from thin air. There's a good book called "The Decorated Diagram," by Klaus Herdeg, in which he convincingly blames Walter Gropius and the Harvard Graduate School of Design for those years.

Expand full comment
author

Love this: "Shaw says, 'Myth is the power of a place, speaking.' We belong to places, not the other way around." Some uncanny echoes of what I wrote about today, too.

Given the sacrifices that logos requires, one might also say that the argument for mythos is the more rational one. I remain amazed that you are able to sustain this vision within academe where the cheapest forms of logos (brand messages, academic assessment, etc) prevail. Keep fighting that good fight!

Expand full comment
author

Thanks, Joshua. And for inviting me to write for Inner Life. This is a subject close to my heart. I might even say that dance of reason and intuition is what animates my life. As for academia's many (many) failings, I take inspiration from my husband, who is a master compartmentalizer. I focus on how much I love my colleagues and the students, and of course architecture (and my health insurance plan), then do what I can to slather all my interactions with mythos. 😂

Expand full comment
author

That said, assessment has amped up considerably in the past couple of years, as we prepare for the onslaught of accreditation after a quiet 8-year hiatus. We've been pushed into some blatant "teaching to the test" that the younger me would've resisted mightily, thereby causing myself much misery. Now, I can see how some of it does improve things, while the rest goes in the category of unavoidable nonsense not worth getting worked up about.

Expand full comment